LANSING, Mich. - Proponents of a Michigan ballot measure that would cut judges' pay 15 percent and eliminate some of their positions is challenging an appeals court decision this week that blocks the proposal from the Nov. 4 ballot.
A three-judge appeals court panel on Aug. 22 said the proposal has a "reach and expanse never before seen" in Michigan constitutional amendments.
Judges Patrick Meter, Bill Schuette and William Whitbeck on Wednesday ordered state election officials to not place the measure on the ballot.
Reform Michigan Government Now is asking the state Supreme Court to hold an emergency hearing on the proposal so county elections officials have time to put the measure on their ballots.
For more on this story, go to Legal Newsline.com
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Confusing wealth with income
by Richard W. Rahn
Which of the following families is "richer"? The first family consists of a wife who has recently become a medical doctor, and she makes $160,000 per year. Her husband is a small business entrepreneur who makes $110,000 per year, giving them a total family income of $270,000 per year. However, they are still paying off the loans the wife took out for medical school and the loans the husband took out to start his business, amounting to debts of $300,000. Their total assets are valued at $450,000; hence, their real net worth or wealth (the difference between gross assets and liabilities) is only $150,000.
The second family consists of a trial lawyer who took early retirement and his non-working wife. They have an annual income of $230,000, all of it derived from interest on tax-free municipal bonds they own. However, their net worth is $7 million, consisting of $5 million in bonds, a million-dollar home with no mortgage, and a million dollars in art work, home furnishings, automobiles and personal items.
The second family is clearly far better off financially than the first family, yet many in the U.S. Congress, including Sen. Barack Obama, want to increase taxes on the first (and poorer) family and not on the wealthier family. They have mis-defined "rich" by confusing a flow (income) with a stock (real net assets), and thus come to the wrong conclusion. They want to tax those (who make more than $250,000 a year) who are trying to become rich, while preserving the status for those who already have wealth.
For more on this commentary, go to CATO.org
Which of the following families is "richer"? The first family consists of a wife who has recently become a medical doctor, and she makes $160,000 per year. Her husband is a small business entrepreneur who makes $110,000 per year, giving them a total family income of $270,000 per year. However, they are still paying off the loans the wife took out for medical school and the loans the husband took out to start his business, amounting to debts of $300,000. Their total assets are valued at $450,000; hence, their real net worth or wealth (the difference between gross assets and liabilities) is only $150,000.
The second family consists of a trial lawyer who took early retirement and his non-working wife. They have an annual income of $230,000, all of it derived from interest on tax-free municipal bonds they own. However, their net worth is $7 million, consisting of $5 million in bonds, a million-dollar home with no mortgage, and a million dollars in art work, home furnishings, automobiles and personal items.
The second family is clearly far better off financially than the first family, yet many in the U.S. Congress, including Sen. Barack Obama, want to increase taxes on the first (and poorer) family and not on the wealthier family. They have mis-defined "rich" by confusing a flow (income) with a stock (real net assets), and thus come to the wrong conclusion. They want to tax those (who make more than $250,000 a year) who are trying to become rich, while preserving the status for those who already have wealth.
For more on this commentary, go to CATO.org
Saturday, August 30, 2008
The Fallacy of We
by Jim Fedako
While watching the Olympics, we tend to cheer participants along national lines. We root for our country's athletes over those from the rest of the world. While there is nothing wrong with this fun diversion, the concept of the individual must never be lost amid the ideal of the collective — the belief that the members of the collective (the nation in this instance) are faceless automatons dedicated to serving the whole.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
While watching the Olympics, we tend to cheer participants along national lines. We root for our country's athletes over those from the rest of the world. While there is nothing wrong with this fun diversion, the concept of the individual must never be lost amid the ideal of the collective — the belief that the members of the collective (the nation in this instance) are faceless automatons dedicated to serving the whole.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Minn. man foils IRS in tax case
WASHINGTON — It took seven years, but Charles Ulrich did something many people dream about, but few succeed at: He beat the IRS in a tax dispute.
Not only that, but tax experts say potentially millions of other taxpayers could benefit from his victory.
The accountant from Baxter, Minn., challenged the method the IRS has used for more than 20 years to tax shares and cash distributed by mutual life insurance firms to their policyholders when they reorganize as public companies.
A federal court recently agreed with his interpretation.
"There's a tremendous amount of money at stake," said Robert Willens, a New York City-based tax analyst at Robert Willens LLC. "Tens of thousands of people could be in line for a refund."
For more on this story, go to FOX News.com
Not only that, but tax experts say potentially millions of other taxpayers could benefit from his victory.
The accountant from Baxter, Minn., challenged the method the IRS has used for more than 20 years to tax shares and cash distributed by mutual life insurance firms to their policyholders when they reorganize as public companies.
A federal court recently agreed with his interpretation.
"There's a tremendous amount of money at stake," said Robert Willens, a New York City-based tax analyst at Robert Willens LLC. "Tens of thousands of people could be in line for a refund."
For more on this story, go to FOX News.com
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Two Georgias, two tales of self-defense
In today's Wall Street Journal, U.S. Sens. Lindsay Graham (R - S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I - Conn.) call upon their fellow countrymen to stand with them in helping to arm Georgians against violence. Specifically, they say, "...Georgian[s]...should be given the ... [weapons] systems necessary to deter any renewe
d ... aggression. These defensive capabilities will help to prevent this conflict from erupting again..."
d ... aggression. These defensive capabilities will help to prevent this conflict from erupting again..."Sadly, the two McCain frontmen were talking about arming Georgians in the former Soviet Union, not Georgia, U.S.A. As it now stands Georgians on the other side of the world have more freedom to bear arms than those next door to Mr. Graham.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Bank pullout in student loan market no reason to panic, financial aid administrators say
Banks across the country are pulling out of the student loan market, but financial aid officials in West Virginia say there is no reason to panic.
About 100 banks and other lenders have stopped participating in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), according to the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Thirty lenders have stopped offering private student loans.
Some West Virginia students have had to switch lenders, but several financial aid officials say they haven't heard of students being denied loans altogether. Still, they're monitoring the situation.
For more on this story, go to The Chareleston Gazette
About 100 banks and other lenders have stopped participating in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), according to the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Thirty lenders have stopped offering private student loans.
Some West Virginia students have had to switch lenders, but several financial aid officials say they haven't heard of students being denied loans altogether. Still, they're monitoring the situation.
For more on this story, go to The Chareleston Gazette
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Mich. reform group ask for additional recusals on ballot initiative
LANSING, Mich. - Proponents of a Michigan ballot measure that would cut judges' pay and eliminate some of their positions are asking the state Court of Appeals to block some judges from hearing challenges to the proposal.
Reform Michigan Government Now says seven of the Appeals Court judges should be disqualified from the case because they could lose their judgeships if the measure passes in November.
Additionally, the measure would eliminate two state Supreme Court justice positions, while 10 judgeships would be added at the circuit court level.
For more on this story, go to Legal Newsline
Photo: Michigan Judge William Whitbeck sat on the three-judge panel that recently heard a motion by Reform Michigan Government Now to have potential appeal's court judges disqualified from ruling on the group's proposed ballot inititive to trim elected officials which includes judges.
Reform Michigan Government Now says seven of the Appeals Court judges should be disqualified from the case because they could lose their judgeships if the measure passes in November.
Additionally, the measure would eliminate two state Supreme Court justice positions, while 10 judgeships would be added at the circuit court level.
For more on this story, go to Legal Newsline
Photo: Michigan Judge William Whitbeck sat on the three-judge panel that recently heard a motion by Reform Michigan Government Now to have potential appeal's court judges disqualified from ruling on the group's proposed ballot inititive to trim elected officials which includes judges.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
The faux Fannie and Freddie bailout figures
by Don A. Rich
A recent study from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has zero credibility. It pegged likely taxpayer losses in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailouts at $25 billion. For those with a sense of history, it is worth remembering that the S&L bailout had a $160 billion price tag. The numbers diverge so far from reality as to be laugh-out-loud funny. Funny, that is, except that the CBO estimate demonstrates a willful disconnect with the actual consequences of federal government actions.
As demonstrated below, the real cost of the bailouts will easily exceed $1.3 trillion. In fact, the real cost is likely to range between $1.3 trillion to $1.6 trillion, and is not unlikely to reach $2.5 trillion.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
A recent study from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has zero credibility. It pegged likely taxpayer losses in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailouts at $25 billion. For those with a sense of history, it is worth remembering that the S&L bailout had a $160 billion price tag. The numbers diverge so far from reality as to be laugh-out-loud funny. Funny, that is, except that the CBO estimate demonstrates a willful disconnect with the actual consequences of federal government actions.
As demonstrated below, the real cost of the bailouts will easily exceed $1.3 trillion. In fact, the real cost is likely to range between $1.3 trillion to $1.6 trillion, and is not unlikely to reach $2.5 trillion.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Friday, August 22, 2008
Freedom to fail
by Steve Greenhut
I love cars, but I also love it when the market weeds out the lousy carmakers.
Being a libertarian, I'm often accused of being pro-business, which is absurd. I'm a believer in free markets, and an essential tenet of free-market thinking is that businesses must be free to fail if they are insufficiently responsive to the needs of the consumer. I love it when lousy businesses fail. Unfortunately, politicians from both parties often try to use taxpayer subsidies and government-enforced protections to help out their favorite businesses or to keep them from falling into the "wrong" hands.
For more on this commentary, go to LewRockwell.com
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Fighting back against junk mail
Did you know the average person gets only 1.5 personal letters each week, compared to 10.8 pieces of junk mail? Each person will receive almost 560 pieces of junk mail this year.
That’s 4.5 million tons of junk mail produced each year!
44 percent of all junk mail is thrown in the trash, unopened and unread. Approximately 40 percent of the solid mass that makes up our landfills is paper and paperboard waste.
Believe or not there are ways to fight this nuisance.
In addition to contacting the Direct Mail Association to opt-out of all unsolicited offers, the folks at the Office of Strategic Influence suggest attaching the postage-paid envelope that comes in the unsolicited letter to a box containing a brick. Since the company has to pay $.25 for each ounce, an eight pound package will set them back $25.
As a take off on this idea, Steven Kinsella on LewRockwell.com suggested a way to stick it to fundraising letters for political candidates, especially the McBama camp. With the right amount of diligence and patience, one can make 2009 a year hassle-free from junk mail.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
3rd Circuit decision in Temple speech-code case has administrators on the run
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit just made hundreds of colleges wonder how long their restrictive speech codes can survive.
On Aug. 4, the Philadelphia-based appellate court affirmed a lower court's ruling against a broadly worded Temple University speech code prohibiting words or deeds whose "purpose or effect [is to create] an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment." Such loose, eye-of-the-beholder standards are increasingly recognized as affronts to the First Amendment, which is right and just.
For more on this editorial, go to The Washington Times
On Aug. 4, the Philadelphia-based appellate court affirmed a lower court's ruling against a broadly worded Temple University speech code prohibiting words or deeds whose "purpose or effect [is to create] an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment." Such loose, eye-of-the-beholder standards are increasingly recognized as affronts to the First Amendment, which is right and just.
For more on this editorial, go to The Washington Times
Monday, August 18, 2008
Learning about drug legalizaton from Motley Crue
by Verdan Vuk
Motley Crue rocked the 1980s. They played hard and partied harder. Their lifestyle was a toxic mixture of drugs, alcohol, fast cars, and fast women. Their reputation for drug abuse remains legendary — rivaling Ozzy Osbourne, the Grateful Dead, and even the Rolling Stones.
Anyone supporting drug legalization must reconcile their position with the existence of these coked-up hallucinating tattooed hooligans on motorcycles. Most citizens fear legalization would lead to the rapid decline of Western Civilization: the youth would jump at drugs; dope would be in every home and every vein; morality would fly out the window, and life as we know it would collapse all around us.
With these "esteemed" gentlemen as examples, only the deranged could support drug legalization. That is, until one examines the specifics more closely.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Motley Crue rocked the 1980s. They played hard and partied harder. Their lifestyle was a toxic mixture of drugs, alcohol, fast cars, and fast women. Their reputation for drug abuse remains legendary — rivaling Ozzy Osbourne, the Grateful Dead, and even the Rolling Stones.
Anyone supporting drug legalization must reconcile their position with the existence of these coked-up hallucinating tattooed hooligans on motorcycles. Most citizens fear legalization would lead to the rapid decline of Western Civilization: the youth would jump at drugs; dope would be in every home and every vein; morality would fly out the window, and life as we know it would collapse all around us.
With these "esteemed" gentlemen as examples, only the deranged could support drug legalization. That is, until one examines the specifics more closely.
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Why the "bad" economic news is good
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell
Sometimes the bad news is the good news. So it is with the report that retail sales are down by 0.1 percent in July, the sharpest drop in many months.
Why good news? It means that consumers are starting to cut back. They could be going into less debt. They might be saving more. They are being more careful about long-term plans pending short-term trends.
These are all preconditions for recovery. It’s only bad news if one adopts the crude theory that economies are sustained by consumer spending. The truth is nearly the opposite. Consumer spending is the final payoff for the less visible foundation of growth, which is real saving and investment – that is, making the choice for the future over the present. What declines in retail spending indicate is a coming to terms with reality.
For more on this commentary, go to LewRockwell.com
Sometimes the bad news is the good news. So it is with the report that retail sales are down by 0.1 percent in July, the sharpest drop in many months.
Why good news? It means that consumers are starting to cut back. They could be going into less debt. They might be saving more. They are being more careful about long-term plans pending short-term trends.
These are all preconditions for recovery. It’s only bad news if one adopts the crude theory that economies are sustained by consumer spending. The truth is nearly the opposite. Consumer spending is the final payoff for the less visible foundation of growth, which is real saving and investment – that is, making the choice for the future over the present. What declines in retail spending indicate is a coming to terms with reality.
For more on this commentary, go to LewRockwell.com
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Remembering the great gold heist of '33
by Thomas E. Woods
It's been 75 years since the federal government, on the spurious grounds of fighting the Great Depression, ordered the confiscation of all monetary gold from Americans, permitting trivial amounts for ornamental or industrial use. This happens to be one of the episodes Kevin Gutzman and I describe in detail in our new book, Who Killed the Constitution? The Fate of American Liberty from World War I to George W. Bush. From the point of view of the typical American classroom, on the other hand, the incident may as well not have occurred.
A key piece of legislation in this story is the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, which Congress passed on March 9 without having read it and after only the most trivial debate. House Minority Leader Bertrand H. Snell (R-NY) generously conceded that it was "entirely out of the ordinary" to pass legislation that "is not even in print at the time it is offered." He urged his colleagues to pass it all the same: "The house is burning down, and the President of the United States says this is the way to put out the fire. [Applause.] And to me at this time there is only one answer to this question, and that is to give the President what he demands and says is necessary to meet the situation."
Among other things, the act retroactively approved the president's closing of private banks throughout the country for several days the previous week, an act for which he had not bothered to provide a legal justification. It gave the secretary of the Treasury the power to require all individuals and corporations to hand over all their gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates if in his judgment "such action is necessary to protect the currency system of the United States."
A key piece of legislation in this story is the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, which Congress passed on March 9 without having read it and after only the most trivial debate. House Minority Leader Bertrand H. Snell (R-NY) generously conceded that it was "entirely out of the ordinary" to pass legislation that "is not even in print at the time it is offered." He urged his colleagues to pass it all the same: "The house is burning down, and the President of the United States says this is the way to put out the fire. [Applause.] And to me at this time there is only one answer to this question, and that is to give the President what he demands and says is necessary to meet the situation."
Among other things, the act retroactively approved the president's closing of private banks throughout the country for several days the previous week, an act for which he had not bothered to provide a legal justification. It gave the secretary of the Treasury the power to require all individuals and corporations to hand over all their gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates if in his judgment "such action is necessary to protect the currency system of the United States."
For more on this commentary, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Poison of Liberal Academia and the End of Free Thought
by Austin C. Moore
They brought you anti-Zionist ex-Marine Maj. Scott Ritter. They brought you anti-Semitic ex-CIA agent Ray McGovern, on Holocaust Memorial Day nonetheless. Now due to pressure of anti-Jewish bias, the West Virginia State University Political Science Department in collaboration with Seneca 2 features "Rabbi" Arthur Waskow to illustrate they are good sports.
Arthur Waskow is famed in liberal Jewish circles as a post-modern and progressive rabbi, whatever that term means. His credentials and his smicha (ordination) are questionable at best considering he is not affiliated with any recognized institution that can confer such an honor, but received it by a private bet din (rabbinical court) of a Jewish feminist, a Conservative rabbi, and a Reform rabbi. Did he have yeshiva or seminary training? This part of his biography is unclear.
Some of "Rabbi" Waskow's teachings:
(1) Waskow Teaches Marxism from Jewish Prophetic Scriptures
The Hebrew Bible is a proponent of economic justice for the poor which is an obligation of every person, even the poor, to give. There is no Hebrew word for charity, its equivalent is tzedekah, or "justice." It is the poor's right to receive, and the affluent's obligation to give. This is a societal expectation of giving charity, but the Bible falls short of overtly advocating Marxist ideology and redistributive justice.
The Bible discusses free market and contracts. Does the Bible not equally support capitalism? It is futile to use selective imagery in the Bible to peddle a political ideology. The Ethics of the Fathers (Pirkei Avot) in the Talmud states, "The Torah should not be used as a spade with which to dig." It is trivial to contend that the Bible endorses or favors either capitalism or marxism, or any given secular political ideology. You can draw from biblical narratives any symbols are messages one desires to see in them by selecting verses. This is also prohibited: "You shall not add or subtract from the Torah."
(2) Waskow is a Critic of Israeli policies in Gaza and West Bank
It is our obligation to hold every state accountable for its actions, and we should be critical of Israel. Many of the actions that Israel has taken regarding Palestinians is based upon national security measures.
We must recall that Israel was provided statehood based upon the international recognition of the 1947 partition plan. This provided for a two-state solution for both Israel and Palestine. Rather than accepting a two-state solution, the Arab League composed of five armies attacked Israel whose secretary called for them to "Murder the Jews."
Many assert Israel has no right to the land, but Jordan was created through the same process a few years earlier setting the precedent for the establishment of Medinat Yisrael.
A double standard is often placed on Israel. Palestinians have rights in Israel. If Palestinians move to Iran or Jordan, they are often not even provided citizenship. This serves as a deterrent for Palestinians to "give up" in Israel. Arab states do not care about Palestinian "victims," they want to challenge the existence of Israel. By deterring immigration into other Arab states, it perpetuates the controversy and continues to demonize Israel. Jews cannot travel freely in Iran, but international human rights groups do not consider this a human rights abuse. Jews cannot be granted citizenship in Jordan, and they cannot own land, but this is not a human rights abuse?
We talk about Palestinian refugees, but what about the Jewish refugees that were expelled from Arab countries with their wealth confiscated by those governments? Where is the international outcry?
Many accuse Israel of denying medicine and food to Palestinians, but if Arabs can provide them with armaments and propaganda, why can they not supply food and medicine?
There must be an Arab recognition of the State of Israel, and acknowledgement that there has been a continuous Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years. whereby they have just as much entitlement to the land. Why do Palestinians only ask for lands that Israel claims. Why not that which Egypt or Jordan has claimed?
Many accuse Israel of excessive force, but how it is wrong to use force against terrorism that comes through suicide bombers and Qassam rockets? The fact remains that the checkpoints and security fences have decreased terrorism in Israel exponentionally. Many criticize Israel for demolishing homes, but where is the disincentive for terrorist activities? Arabs nationals often provide economic subsidies to the family of suicide bombers. There must be a penalty. There are observant Jewish Zionists and anti-Zionists, but I believe Jewish law affirms Israel's position and claim to the land for a multitude of reasons. My only regret is that German Jews did not have the refuge of a Jewish state which could have prevented the massacre of many.
I support Palestinian statehood because they will formally be held accountable as an international actor. The details are the problem. I do not believe it will cease tension between Israel and its neighbors. There is no solution in which Israel will escape popular in the court of public opinion. Giving up Israel would not make us any more popular contrary to popular myth. There would be massive retaliation and pogroms, as well as oppressive dhimmi laws, and they would force Jews to desecrate the Sabbath.
(3) Waskow Opposes the Iraq War
There is little justification for the War in Iraq. I am grateful that Saddam Hussen has been brought to justice, but the ends do not justify the means. There remains little justification for invading Iraq under the Bush Administration's suspicions. However, America made a mess and must remain committed to clean it up, or until the Iraqi government requests our withdrawal. For those who argue AIPAC and the Jewish Lobby was behind the invasion, there is little support. The Iraq War has only destabilized Iraq and opened the Middle East up to Iranian hegemony, which is must more dangerous to Iraq. Jews are accused for Middle East problems. Jews are accused for 9/11. Jews are accused for corporate greed and neo-conservative politics. Jews are accused for high gas prices? Once again we are the favorite scapegoat for problems. Why is Waskow encouraging these conspiracy theories?
(4) Waskow Defended Cindy Sheehan
Cindy Sheehan is an undeniable anti-Semite who holds extreme views, and to support her only calls "Rabbi" Waskows own credibility into question. This is the woman who said Israel and Jews were responsible for her son's death. Why is a "rabbi" promoting anti-Semitism?
(5) Endorsement of Gay and Lesbian Marriages in Judaism
Advocating same-sex marriage in Judaism completely ignores the obligation for procreation, which can only be accomplished through a man and a woman. The marriage is known as kiddushin, or "sanctification," but how is something forbidden in the Torah and Talmud, considered sanctified or holy by a "rabbi"?
"Rabbi" Waskow engages in heresy by selectively choosing that from the Hebrew Bible to apply that makes it acceptable for modern secular norms. This is not biblical scholarship, it is a religion of convenience.
There is no problem with advocating against discrimination against homosexuals in such areas as employment and housing, but this is a matter of civil rights. An outright endorsement of Jewish same-sex marriage is a completely different matter that contravenes the Torah, the book for which "rabbis" like Waskow claim their authority derives from.
Why is it that we have a public institution whose mission should be academic freedom and free discourse suppressing opposing points of view in sponsoring presenters? Why are round-table discussions, presenting opposing views, not permitted? Heavens forbid if we express a point of view that deviates from the Communist Manifesto.
Why is a conservative viewpoint considered un-academic by the faculty, but hosting speakers who suggest legitimacy for conspiracies theory are considered academic and credible? It really is a joke, but no one is laughing.
We have professors who publicly ridicule students' religious and political beliefs in classes and on their essays. This is academic freedom, advanced society, and the liberalism they extol? You have freedom of speech all right. If you share their opinion. Apparently academic freedom only applies to faculty, not to students.
We have Department Chairman Gerald Beller who screams about providing terrorists legal immunities, but he is not even willing to give his students opportunity to present an opposing view. Misplaced priorities in academia. It is no surprise that my papers and essays have always received better scores when I shared Dr. Beller's opinions. Why should I have to censor my genuine thoughts? He teaches John Mill's "On Liberty" but he ignored its virtues as a basis for free thought. Okay, don't practice what you teach. Dr. Smith tells me if I want a conservative viewpoint, I can go to the University of Charleston. This is real good for recruitment and retention, right? I don't want a liberal or conservative viewpoint, I want balanced presentation and true discourse which promotes critical thinking. Liberal academics are hypocrites. It's not "liberalism" but authoritarian liberalism which is somewhat of an oxymoron.
Look for Waskow's lecture in October.
A tradtional/conservative Jew, Moore is a WVSU Senior and former SGA President
They brought you anti-Zionist ex-Marine Maj. Scott Ritter. They brought you anti-Semitic ex-CIA agent Ray McGovern, on Holocaust Memorial Day nonetheless. Now due to pressure of anti-Jewish bias, the West Virginia State University Political Science Department in collaboration with Seneca 2 features "Rabbi" Arthur Waskow to illustrate they are good sports.
Arthur Waskow is famed in liberal Jewish circles as a post-modern and progressive rabbi, whatever that term means. His credentials and his smicha (ordination) are questionable at best considering he is not affiliated with any recognized institution that can confer such an honor, but received it by a private bet din (rabbinical court) of a Jewish feminist, a Conservative rabbi, and a Reform rabbi. Did he have yeshiva or seminary training? This part of his biography is unclear.
Some of "Rabbi" Waskow's teachings:
(1) Waskow Teaches Marxism from Jewish Prophetic Scriptures
The Hebrew Bible is a proponent of economic justice for the poor which is an obligation of every person, even the poor, to give. There is no Hebrew word for charity, its equivalent is tzedekah, or "justice." It is the poor's right to receive, and the affluent's obligation to give. This is a societal expectation of giving charity, but the Bible falls short of overtly advocating Marxist ideology and redistributive justice.
The Bible discusses free market and contracts. Does the Bible not equally support capitalism? It is futile to use selective imagery in the Bible to peddle a political ideology. The Ethics of the Fathers (Pirkei Avot) in the Talmud states, "The Torah should not be used as a spade with which to dig." It is trivial to contend that the Bible endorses or favors either capitalism or marxism, or any given secular political ideology. You can draw from biblical narratives any symbols are messages one desires to see in them by selecting verses. This is also prohibited: "You shall not add or subtract from the Torah."
(2) Waskow is a Critic of Israeli policies in Gaza and West Bank
It is our obligation to hold every state accountable for its actions, and we should be critical of Israel. Many of the actions that Israel has taken regarding Palestinians is based upon national security measures.
We must recall that Israel was provided statehood based upon the international recognition of the 1947 partition plan. This provided for a two-state solution for both Israel and Palestine. Rather than accepting a two-state solution, the Arab League composed of five armies attacked Israel whose secretary called for them to "Murder the Jews."
Many assert Israel has no right to the land, but Jordan was created through the same process a few years earlier setting the precedent for the establishment of Medinat Yisrael.
A double standard is often placed on Israel. Palestinians have rights in Israel. If Palestinians move to Iran or Jordan, they are often not even provided citizenship. This serves as a deterrent for Palestinians to "give up" in Israel. Arab states do not care about Palestinian "victims," they want to challenge the existence of Israel. By deterring immigration into other Arab states, it perpetuates the controversy and continues to demonize Israel. Jews cannot travel freely in Iran, but international human rights groups do not consider this a human rights abuse. Jews cannot be granted citizenship in Jordan, and they cannot own land, but this is not a human rights abuse?
We talk about Palestinian refugees, but what about the Jewish refugees that were expelled from Arab countries with their wealth confiscated by those governments? Where is the international outcry?
Many accuse Israel of denying medicine and food to Palestinians, but if Arabs can provide them with armaments and propaganda, why can they not supply food and medicine?
There must be an Arab recognition of the State of Israel, and acknowledgement that there has been a continuous Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years. whereby they have just as much entitlement to the land. Why do Palestinians only ask for lands that Israel claims. Why not that which Egypt or Jordan has claimed?
Many accuse Israel of excessive force, but how it is wrong to use force against terrorism that comes through suicide bombers and Qassam rockets? The fact remains that the checkpoints and security fences have decreased terrorism in Israel exponentionally. Many criticize Israel for demolishing homes, but where is the disincentive for terrorist activities? Arabs nationals often provide economic subsidies to the family of suicide bombers. There must be a penalty. There are observant Jewish Zionists and anti-Zionists, but I believe Jewish law affirms Israel's position and claim to the land for a multitude of reasons. My only regret is that German Jews did not have the refuge of a Jewish state which could have prevented the massacre of many.
I support Palestinian statehood because they will formally be held accountable as an international actor. The details are the problem. I do not believe it will cease tension between Israel and its neighbors. There is no solution in which Israel will escape popular in the court of public opinion. Giving up Israel would not make us any more popular contrary to popular myth. There would be massive retaliation and pogroms, as well as oppressive dhimmi laws, and they would force Jews to desecrate the Sabbath.
(3) Waskow Opposes the Iraq War
There is little justification for the War in Iraq. I am grateful that Saddam Hussen has been brought to justice, but the ends do not justify the means. There remains little justification for invading Iraq under the Bush Administration's suspicions. However, America made a mess and must remain committed to clean it up, or until the Iraqi government requests our withdrawal. For those who argue AIPAC and the Jewish Lobby was behind the invasion, there is little support. The Iraq War has only destabilized Iraq and opened the Middle East up to Iranian hegemony, which is must more dangerous to Iraq. Jews are accused for Middle East problems. Jews are accused for 9/11. Jews are accused for corporate greed and neo-conservative politics. Jews are accused for high gas prices? Once again we are the favorite scapegoat for problems. Why is Waskow encouraging these conspiracy theories?
(4) Waskow Defended Cindy Sheehan
Cindy Sheehan is an undeniable anti-Semite who holds extreme views, and to support her only calls "Rabbi" Waskows own credibility into question. This is the woman who said Israel and Jews were responsible for her son's death. Why is a "rabbi" promoting anti-Semitism?
(5) Endorsement of Gay and Lesbian Marriages in Judaism
Advocating same-sex marriage in Judaism completely ignores the obligation for procreation, which can only be accomplished through a man and a woman. The marriage is known as kiddushin, or "sanctification," but how is something forbidden in the Torah and Talmud, considered sanctified or holy by a "rabbi"?
"Rabbi" Waskow engages in heresy by selectively choosing that from the Hebrew Bible to apply that makes it acceptable for modern secular norms. This is not biblical scholarship, it is a religion of convenience.
There is no problem with advocating against discrimination against homosexuals in such areas as employment and housing, but this is a matter of civil rights. An outright endorsement of Jewish same-sex marriage is a completely different matter that contravenes the Torah, the book for which "rabbis" like Waskow claim their authority derives from.
Why is it that we have a public institution whose mission should be academic freedom and free discourse suppressing opposing points of view in sponsoring presenters? Why are round-table discussions, presenting opposing views, not permitted? Heavens forbid if we express a point of view that deviates from the Communist Manifesto.
Why is a conservative viewpoint considered un-academic by the faculty, but hosting speakers who suggest legitimacy for conspiracies theory are considered academic and credible? It really is a joke, but no one is laughing.
We have professors who publicly ridicule students' religious and political beliefs in classes and on their essays. This is academic freedom, advanced society, and the liberalism they extol? You have freedom of speech all right. If you share their opinion. Apparently academic freedom only applies to faculty, not to students.
We have Department Chairman Gerald Beller who screams about providing terrorists legal immunities, but he is not even willing to give his students opportunity to present an opposing view. Misplaced priorities in academia. It is no surprise that my papers and essays have always received better scores when I shared Dr. Beller's opinions. Why should I have to censor my genuine thoughts? He teaches John Mill's "On Liberty" but he ignored its virtues as a basis for free thought. Okay, don't practice what you teach. Dr. Smith tells me if I want a conservative viewpoint, I can go to the University of Charleston. This is real good for recruitment and retention, right? I don't want a liberal or conservative viewpoint, I want balanced presentation and true discourse which promotes critical thinking. Liberal academics are hypocrites. It's not "liberalism" but authoritarian liberalism which is somewhat of an oxymoron.
Look for Waskow's lecture in October.
A tradtional/conservative Jew, Moore is a WVSU Senior and former SGA President
Friday, August 15, 2008
McCain, Obama Equally Ignorant on Solving Gas Price Crisis
by Radley Balko
In an interview last week on National Public Radio, Barack Obama was asked about his proposal for a "windfall profits" profits tax on oil companies. To her credit, the interviewer prefaced her question by noting that nearly all economists from across the political spectrum oppose the idea. Taxing oil company profits won't make gas any cheaper — it'll likely make it more expensive in the long run by discouraging exploration — and it won't speed the development of alternative energy sources. Obama's answer was pure demagoguery, pitting senior citizens and working class families against oil companies, who he says are reaping profits "hand over fist."
Obama's opponent John McCain has smartly opposed a tax on oil company profits — and Obama has promptly attacked him for it.
But McCain isn't much better. McCain has proposed an equally ridiculous "gas tax holiday," which will also do almost nothing to provide relief at the pump. Obama has smartly opposed the idea — and McCain has promptly attacked him for it.
Economic ignorance is nothing new in politics. Neither is the idea that a candidate would perpetuate economic idiocy he knows to be false because it plays into the narrative he's pitching to the voters. But no issue seems to prompt more jaw-dropping sophistry and anti-capitalist demagoguery than gas prices.
For more on this commentary , go to FOX News.com
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Hazo W. Carter Jr.: A progressive thinker on the matter of retaliation
On Tuesday and Wednesday, the WVSU Free Press published two seperate, but related stories.
On Tuesday, the Free Press reposted a story from The Houston Chronicle about an additional $350,000 a federal jury awarded three former Texas Southern University students. On August 1, the jury awarded William G. Hudson, Justin G. Jordan and Oliver J. Brown, known as the TSU 3, $190,000 in compensatory damages in a freedom-of-speech lawsuit they filed against the university.
In their suit, the TSU 3 alleged university officials, including former President Priscilla Slade, violated their First Amendment rights following their efforts to expose corruption on campus. In awarding the TSU the additional $350,000 in puntitive damages on August 7, the jury said it wanted to send a strong message against retaliation.
On Wednesday, an article from the Student Press Law Center concerning S. B. 1370 in California was reposted. After passing the Califorinia Senate 72-1, S. B. 1370, the Journalism Teacher Protection Act, was sent to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on August 5 for signature.
According to SPLC, S. B. 1370 was initially introducted into the California Assembly in 2006 after Janet Ewell, the student newspaper adviser for Rancho Alamitos High School, was removed from her position as adviser after she permitted students to write editorials critical of school employees and facilities. Broadened to protect all teachers, S.B. 1370 shields "an employee from being dismissed, suspended, disciplined, reassigned, transferred, or otherwise retaliated against for" protecting students exercising their constitutional rights.
Seeing how a jury and lawmakers had to step in and it in Texas and California, respectfully, it's refreshing to know that retaliation is not a problem in smaller educational instiutions like State. Students, faculty, staff and alumni should be proud that the Mountain State's oldest historically black university has such a progessive thinker in President Hazo W. Carter Jr.
In light of retaliation only recently being addressed in Texas and California, let us recall the insightful and harrowing words spoken by Dr. Carter nearly two years ago on Nov. 30, 2006:
"We will not tolerate retaliation. If there is
ever any of that kind of threat, you can come to one of us."
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Bill terminating retaliation against journalism advisors now on Schwarzenegger's desk
Sacramento, Calif. — The California State Senate passed a bill August 5 that would protect journalism advisers and other teachers against retaliation by administrators because of student speech, but because of budget issues, the bill might not be signed or vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger until as late as the end of September.
The bill, S.B.1370, authored by Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco/San Mateo), passed through the Senate 31-2 and the Assembly 72-1.
"I expect the Governor to sign this bill into law, as has consistently supported our efforts to make sure true freedom of the press is alive and well on our campuses," Yee said in a press release.
For more on this story, go to The Student Press Law Center
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
TSU whistleblowers awarded $540,000
Houston, Tex. - A jury awarded $540,000 to three former Texas Southern University student activists Thursday and let the school know that retaliation against whistle-blowers won't be tolerated.
"We wanted to send a message that this should not happen again — the violation of First Amendment rights and the false arrest," one juror said after the jury added $350,000 in punitive damages to the $190,000 they awarded the trio last week to compensate them for being kicked out of school and temporarily charged with a crime after helping uncover a financial scandal.
After deciding the extra damages Thursday afternoon, 10 jurors were grilled by the attorneys on their thoughts. Several said they were impressed by the young men. Juror Donnie Mathis hugged the three and said she was proud of them.
For more on this story, go to The Houston Chronicle
Buffalo mayor orders return of media access to crime info
Buffalo, N.Y. - Mayor Byron W. Brown on Thursday ordered police to restore the media’s access to crime information that had been removed from a Police Department computer in recent months.
The mayor said he had been unaware the information had been suppressed, and he blamed the policy change on “miscommunication ” caused by a “poorly worded memo.”
Brown said that he had discussions in January with representative of The Buffalo News and that those talks produced an agreement about what crime data police would provide.“
It was implemented, and somehow it was changed without me being told,” Brown said Thursday, adding that the change hit him “out of left field.”
For more on this article, go to The Buffalo News
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Farewell to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
by Yuri N. Maltsev
Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn, writer, Nobel Prize winner, and the most famous Soviet dissident died at the age of 89 on August 3, 2008 in his home near Moscow. He lived a long and hard life, but he died the way that he wanted to: "He wanted to die in the summer – and he died in the summer," his wife Natalya said. "He wanted to die at home – and he died at home. In general I should say that Aleksandr Isayevich lived a difficult but happy life."
For more on this op/ed, go to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Saturday, August 9, 2008
FIRE seeking student help to put heat on WVSU administration for First Amendment abuses
The Torch has been ablaze this week with news and commentary on the victory for freedom of expression in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in DeJohn vs. Temple University. If your university is in a state under the Third Circuit's jurisdiction—that's Pennsylvania, Delaware, or New Jersey—then your school's policies must abide by the strictures of the judges' ruling.
If you're a student at a public college or university in one of those states and you'd like to learn more about your school's speech policies, check out FIRE's Spotlight, our database of policies restricting speech at schools across the country. But whether your university falls under the jurisdiction of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals or not, I encourage you to join FIRE's Campus Freedom Network (CFN) and work with FIRE to make your campus safe for liberty. FIRE is happy to supply you with all the help you'll need, including FIRE's Guides to Student Rights on Campus, Spotlight: The Campus Freedom Resource, and FIRE's multimedia project.
Additionally, FIRE speakers stand ready and willing to speak on your campus. Book one today!
To enlist your aid in the cause, contact Luke Sheahan, pictured above, either via e-mail at fire@thefire.org or telephone at (215) 717-FIRE.
Friday, August 8, 2008
The story behind the story of the TSU 3
On the night of Dec. 4, 2004, a Texas Southern University student named Ashley Sloan was gunned down near campus, struck in the temple by a bullet after leaving a party with her friends. A fight inside the party had reignited outside, and someone pulled a gun. Sloan’s friends were able to shield themselves behind a car as the shots rang out, but the 20-year-old sophomore didn’t make it in time. She died in the parking lot.
The murder prompted an outpouring of accusations on campus of poor security. For many Houstonians, the shooting raised old fears of the violence-plagued TSU of the 1990s, which many thought had since been cleaned up by then-president Dr. Priscilla Slade.
As it turns out, the shooting would set in motion a series of events that not only called into question Slade’s multimillion dollar “academic renaissance,” but revealed a campus administration entrenched in scandal.
Slade’s vis
ion for TSU was dazzling and reflected her own larger-than-life personality. At 53, Slade turned heads on campus, cruising around in her black Jaguar convertible and designer suits. For years, TSU, located eight miles from downtown Houston, lagged academically in comparison with nearby public universities Texas State University and the University of Houston, but Slade was said to be taking the provincial TSU and putting it on the map, nationally and internationally.In her first few years as president, Slade had doubled enrollment to 12,000 students, launched the university’s first $50 million fund-raising campaign and a construction boom on campus, including a $25 million science building that features a four-story glass atrium and a NASA research center.
There is a new Tavis Smiley School of Communications, a new School of Public Affairs and a new College of Liberal Arts and Behavioral Sciences. The law school has been expanded and, for the first time in its history, posted higher Texas Bar exam passage rates than its main competitor, Texas Tech University. And in Diverse’s Top 100 rankings, TSU was the second highest producer of first professional degrees for African-Americans during the 2004-2005 academic year, second only to Howard University. The School of Business received accreditation in 2002, and the university has added master’s and doctoral programs in administration of justice, urban planning and environmental policy, pharmaceutical science and others. So although, some professors grumbled about Slade’s flashy persona, more felt she made TSU proud.
TSU spokeswoman Gayle Colston Barge points to new initiatives like the on-campus child care center and a summer remedial program for freshmen as examples of how TSU is helping support students, more than 40 percent of whom are the first in their families to attend college.
“I don’t know if that would have happened under just anyone; it could have, but I doubt it,” says TSU regent David Diaz, about the university’s growth.
TSU appeared to be putting the problems of the 1990s behind it. Before Slade arrived, the university switchboard often went unanswered, professors often didn’t show up for class and there was no standard accounting procedure. There was even a movement afoot to place the school under the University of Texas System because of mismanagement and poor bookkeeping.
However, to some on campus, Ashley Sloan’s murder demonstrated that Slade’s positive public image masked deep problems throughout the university. For instance, says Justin Jordan, freshman class president at the time of Sloan’s murder, the push for higher enrollment brought dangerous students to campus. Although the students had no real interest in academia, their tuition and fees helped fuel Slade’s grandeur, he says. And according to The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, only 6 percent of TSU’s students who graduated in spring 2005 had earned their degrees within four years, one of the lowest rates in the nation.
“These are just fancy buildings. Nothing’s happening in them,” says Jordan. “It’s sick that people would treat an institute of higher learning like this.”
Jordan decided that he had to do something.
For more on this story, go to Diverse: Issues in Higher Education.
Photos: The "TSU 3",from left, Oliver Brown, Justin Jordan and William Hudson (above), and former TSU President Priscilla Slade (below).
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Hazo W. Carter Jr, the TSU 3 and retaliation
Yesterday, the WVSU Free Press reposted a story from The Houston Chronicle and The Torch concerning the Texas Southern University 3. On Friday, a federal jury awarded the TSU 3 - William G. Hudson, Justin R. Jordan, and Oliver J. Brown - a total of $200,000 in damages in a lawsuit they filed against TSU for retaliation in speaking out against corruption at the school.
According to press reports, the three, who were involved with student government, discovered suspicious payroll documents in 2004. After taking their concerns to both TSU and state officials, including Gov. Rick Perry, the three were expelled from school, and later arrested.
However, the three cooperated with the FBI which led to the indictments of Quinten Wiggins, TSU chief financial officer, and Priscilla Slade, the president. Though Wiggins received a 10-year prison sentenced, the government negiotated a deal with Slade for her repay $130,000 of $500,000 she allegedly stole from TSU coffers.
Like WVSU, TSU is a historically black college or university. Unlike TSU, however, WVSU is not only on firm financial footing, but also boasts of an administration that takes any concerns of wrongdoing seriously.
Let us not forget, it is Hazo W. Carter Jr., who in his 20 years as State's president has never had a whiff of scandal, who has taken a hardline against retaliation. It's unfortunate that his colleague in Texas did not hear the prophetic words he uttered on Nov. 30, 2006:
"We will not tolerate retaliation. If there is ever any of that kind of threat, you can come to one of us."
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Texas Southern retaliated against student whistleblowers, jury finds
Houston, Tex. - Texas Southern University officials kicked out three students and had them arrested in retaliation for their public criticism of administrators, a federal jury decided Friday.
The jury of nine women and three men deliberated for 12 hours Thursday and Friday before unanimously accepting all the claims of William G. Hudson, Justin R. Jordan and Oliver J. Brown, who in 2005 sued the TSU regents, then-President Priscilla Slade and other university officials.
The former students were seeking at least $150,000 each and also sued to have their student disciplinary records purged.
Jurors awarded actual damages totaling nearly $200,000 for all three. The jury returns next week to decide on punitive damages, unless the opposing sides settle on that matter.
"At least someone stood up for us, and the jury stood up for us," said Brown.
For more on this story, go to The Houston Chronicle, and The Torch, the official blog of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Putting a halt to corporate welfare
Albany, N.Y. - Yesterday, Buffalo attorney and self-proclaimed "anti-politician" James Ostrowski filed suit in the Albany Supreme Court on behalf of 47 taxpayers to halt the state's practice of awarding over $1 billion in "economic development" grants to private corporations. The basis for the suit is an 1846 amendment to the state constitution banning the government from bestowing "gifts" to private entities.
According to Ostrowski, the 1846 amendment was passed when speculators selling politicians on the benefits of "internal improvements" left taxpayers holding the bag. Though a proposed 1967 amendment to overturn the 1846 amendment was defeated by a 3-to-1 margin, "state officials have acted as though the 1967 amendment had become law."
A copy of "The Mother of All Lawsuits," may be found on Ostrowski's blog.
Also, Ostrowski announced his intentions to file similar suits in all 50 states. Though the late-Larry Harless attempted with limited success to challenge the $200 million in economic development grants then-Gov. Bob Wise doled out in 2002, given that two new justices will be elected to the Supreme Court in November the timing may be right for a second, more principled legal challenge.
Anyone wanting to assist Mr. Ostrowski in this endeavor may contact him via telephone at (716) 435-8918 or e-mail at jameso@apollo3.com.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Why Wal-Mart should get into higher ed
by Gary North
I earned my Ph.D. in 1972. What I am about to describe is academically feasible. It is surely economically feasible.
Wal-Mart should start a college. As with virtually all colleges, it would be called a university. Why? Because of higher perceived value by the consumers.
Why should Wal-Mart bother? Here is a good reason. The total expenditure in the United States on higher education is in the range of a third of a trillion dollars a year. That is a great deal of money. Wal-Mart is not a company to let a large profit opportunity drift by.
You would be hard-pressed to find any industry with this level of income that is less efficient than higher education. If Wal-Mart gets into the field, this will change.
Wal-Mart could offer far lower tuition than any other private university, and lower than 80% of tax-funded universities. All it needs to do is offer what is already available, but which almost no one knows about.
For more on this op/ed, go to LewRockwell.com
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Exposing the War racket
Earlier this week, Investigative Reporters and Editors, a non-profit clearinghouse for investigative reporters worldwide, posted two separate, but related stories on its Extra! Extra! page.
The first is from Peter Spiegel of The Los Angeles Times' Washington Bureau. On July 30, Spiegel reported that Stuart W. Bowen Jr., the U.S. special inspector general for Iraq, called for an end to all American funding of Iraqi reconstruction "because the Iraqi oil windfall plus unspent funds from earlier budgets are more than adequate to meet the country's reconstruction needs."
The second is from an Associated Press report on the first anniversary of the collapse of a section of I-35W in Minneapolis, Minn. that left 13 people dead. According to the AP, "two of every three of the busiest problem bridges in each state — carrying nearly 40 million vehicles a day — have had no work beyond regular maintenance."
Partly because of the I-35W tragedy, officials in nearly every state have made efforts to address the problem. However, "[s]oaring construction costs, budget shortages, election-year politics, a backlog of bridge projects, competing highway repairs and bureaucracy often held bridge work to only incremental progress."
Once again, Mr. Butler's maxim, that "War is a Racket" has been proven correct.
Friday, August 1, 2008
National servitude
by William Norman Grigg
Altruistic service likewise abounds in the United States. It takes place in families, religious communities, private clubs and fraternal organizations, and in the form of spontaneous individual acts of conscience.
Service is a pervasive blessing of a free-market society – or even a society as cankered with collectivism as ours has become.
Every second of each day, countless acts of service are being rendered. They are performed by auto mechanics and attorneys, doctors and dog groomers, musicians and manicurists; service is given by "sales" associates in our much-maligned retail superstores, by taxi drivers, by convenience store clerks.
Those services are offered in voluntary exchange for money (well, the government-issued simulacrum of 
the same) on terms that are mutually beneficial to the buyer and seller.
the same) on terms that are mutually beneficial to the buyer and seller. Altruistic service likewise abounds in the United States. It takes place in families, religious communities, private clubs and fraternal organizations, and in the form of spontaneous individual acts of conscience.
To an advocate of "National Service," however, none of these activities are innately worthwhile. They haven't been mandated or certified by the State. Thus they are missing the magic ingredient that supposedly makes government "service" morally superior to the private variety: Coercion.
For more on this op/ed piece, go to LewRockwell.com. Also, visit Grigg's blog, Pro Libertate
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)